Supplier documentation catalogue

Publishes lot-referenced certificates from a named laboratory, with the lot numbers repeated on the product pages. The documents are shown in full and include both an HPLC chromatogram and a mass spectrum, so identity as well as purity is addressed. One certificate carries an endotoxin result under USP<85> — the only endotoxin figure found anywhere in this catalogue — but no sterility report was found despite a site-wide "Sterility Verified" banner. A city is published but no street address, suite or registered legal entity, and no laboratory accreditation number is cited.

Publishes a large archive of lot-referenced certificates from a named laboratory, with an HPLC chromatogram and peak list on the document and the method stated as HPLC-UV-MS. No sterility or endotoxin report was found and no accreditation number is cited. The laboratory address printed on the certificate differs from the address on that laboratory’s own website, and on the certificate examined the date in the file name does not match the analysis date printed on the document. No street address, legal entity or age requirement is published.

Publishes a 44-entry certificate index with batch numbers that also appear on the product pages, attributed to a named laboratory in Basel, Switzerland. The certificates are hosted on that laboratory’s external domain rather than on the supplier’s own site, and the individual certificate URL did not resolve to a document when fetched, so their contents — including whether any chromatogram or spectrum is shown — could not be verified. It is the only supplier in this catalogue publishing a registered legal entity. GLP-1-class products are addressed by codes, with the product page displaying the code rather than the drug name.

Publishes a two-page certificate per product size with a lot number, analysis date and signature date, issued by a named laboratory. Method is printed as HPLC-UV-MS with a chromatogram. A US address and phone are published. Returns are expressly not accepted, and there is no regulatory-disclosure section.

Publishes purity percentages and a "3rd Party Tested" badge on product pages but no certificate of analysis, no lot or batch number and no testing laboratory name; the certificate URL returns HTTP 404 and no chromatogram or spectrum was found anywhere on the site. Its own terms state that the products have not been sterilized or tested by the company for safety and efficacy in any use. A 30-day return policy and a stated minimum age of 21 are published, but no street address and no legal entity.

The only supplier in this set whose certificate carries an ISO 17025 accreditation mark and a citable accreditation number. Certificates are lot-specific and signed by a named laboratory director. The gap is method coverage: HPLC purity is shown without a mass-spectrometry identity report, so the document establishes purity but not identity.

The site states that certificates are provided for every research peptide and that HPLC and LC-MS testing is performed by certified laboratories, but we could not locate a publicly viewable, lot-specific certificate, and no laboratory is named anywhere. Part of the catalogue sits behind an account application, which may limit what is publicly visible — that limitation is recorded rather than scored around.

Publishes lot-referenced certificates from a named laboratory showing both an HPLC chromatogram and a mass spectrum, with identity stated as established by LC-MS. The lot number appears on the certificate but not on the product page. No sterility or endotoxin report was found and no accreditation number is cited. A full street address with a unit number and a 30-day unopened-product refund policy are published; no registered legal entity is named, and the site states two different minimum ages in two places.

Publishes certificates for a subset of its catalogue as images on its own letterhead. The one examined identifies the sample by catalogue number rather than by lot, so it cannot be matched to a shipped batch; it names no testing laboratory, carries no signature or accreditation number, and is dated 2016. It reports an HPLC purity figure and records mass spectrometry only as the word "Consistent", with no chromatogram or spectrum reproduced. No sterility or endotoxin report, street address or legal entity was found, and the stated policy is that all sales are final.

Publishes lot-referenced certificates from a named laboratory, and the documents include both a chromatogram and a mass spectrum. The laboratory’s own site returned HTTP 403, so its address and any accreditation could not be verified, and no accreditation number appears on the certificate. Three GLP-1-class products are sold under codes rather than drug names, and the certificate’s identity field reports a code rather than the compound. Lot numbers appear on the certificates but not on the product listings; no sterility or endotoxin report, street address or legal entity was found.

Publishes a public certificate page with a named laboratory, a named analyst and full laboratory contact details, and explicitly criticises suppliers that redact testing-company contact information. The certificate examined is lot-specific. The limitation is that the page shows the latest certificate per product rather than a lookup for the lot actually shipped.

Documentation is strong and unusually verifiable — 44 dated reports, batch-specific, each carrying a key the reader can check against the issuing laboratory. Two things pull the score down and neither concerns product quality: a US street address could not be verified from the site, and an FDA warning letter dated 2024-12-10 is on record for this entity and domain with no disclosure of it anywhere on the site.